The Theory Of Justice Through The Principles Of Utility

In this essay I will assess and evaluate Mill’s concept of justice through the principles of utility. I will argue to defend Mill’s attempt to reconcile justice with the utilitarian principles he has explained by first summarizing these concepts and by proving utility. Summary John Stuart Mill introduces his assessment of Utilitarianism by stating how a standardized system in which people’s actions may be judged to differentiate between right and wrong has been minimal in progress. He expresses the misconception with the way utility is understood by the general populous and other philosophers. The struggle to lay the foundations in what constitutes as right and wrong dates longer back than 2000 years ago. Before Mill could analyse the concepts of Utilitarianism his first action was to break down any barriers that caused people to turn away from its insights. All actions exist as a means to promote a particular end; thus an action may only be deemed right or wrong based on the desired outcome of said action. If the sought out ends cause suffering towards others, the actions will be considered to have been bad; just the same as if an end causes happiness, the actions that caused this result will be deemed as good. Therefore, having a standard as to how humans can be judged between good and bad is necessary. Mill argues that â€Å"particular truth precedes general theory† (p. 2), unlike the rules of applicable sciences we know of, ethics demands ‘general laws’ in order forShow MoreRelatedWhy You Should Never Read A Theory Of Justice1343 Words   |  6 PagesWhy You Should Actually Read A Theory of Justice If pressed for the most simplistic one-sentence answer to how I viewed my understanding of this work I would not hesitate to exclaim, â€Å"The most conclusive qualitative argument for ‘justice as fairness’†. Notwithstanding, this simplistic review needs to be supported in a way that encourages others, who are inclined, to relish the challenge of critical discourse on the imperative questions of political philosophy raised by John Rawls. Before I beginRead MoreEssay on Should Justice be the Supreme Virtue of Societies1237 Words   |  5 Pages Should Justice be the Supreme Virtue of Societies? Social justice is distributive. It operates under the principle that each person must get his or her due. However, it is quite contentious as to precisely what each persons due is and thus opens the debate as to what justice is. Moreover, once a definition of justice is agreed upon (in a particular state), the question may be raised of how important it is. Is justice salient, or is there another concept that transcendsRead MoreUtilitarianism, And Principle Of Utility1319 Words   |  6 Pagesand principle of utility will be discussed. Also Mill’s other statement called On Liberty will be discussed as well. What is utilitarianism according to Mill? â€Å"In any moral theory that claims that actions are good only insofar as they increase the amount of happiness in the world.† (Solomon, Martin and Vaught). This is based on principle of utility, which is do the action which provides the greatest happiness for the greatest number† (Solomon, Martin and Vaught). Mill s principle of utility hasRead MoreThe Mill Would Disagree With Rawls Interpretation Utilitarianism841 Words   |  4 Pages23-24) Mill states the principle of utility should not be used to create justice but to reserve or increase the happiness of the population. Mills states that the principle of utility should solely be used as mediation, such as moral quandary. Mill states on to say that we should solely abide by the principle of utility when faced with a moral dilemma. For example, if I were to be in the presence of a fellow peer being robbed it would my duty, in the name of the principle of utility, to stop and apprehendRead MoreRawls Maximin Principle1464 Words   |  6 PagesRawls Maximin Principle: Is It Really The Most Rational Solution? Political philosophy aims to reflect the normative and conceptual dimensions of political life. American philosopher John Rawls is widely recognized as one of the leading political philosophers of the twentieth century. His A Theory of Justice (1971) is one of the primary texts in political philosophy and proposes two principles of justice. The first, the liberty principle, defines basic liberties and the second, the differenceRead MorePlato And Aristotle s Theories Of Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics1408 Words   |  6 PagesThe ancient theories of Plato and Aristotle differ greatly from the contemporary theories of Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics. Plato and Aristotle focused on the importance of virtue in an individual’s life. Plato believed that purity of the soul was the most important thing in life and can be achieved by mastering the four virtues: justice, wisdom, courage, and moderation. Aristotle believed that the goal of human life was to achieve happiness, whi ch is made possible by the cultivation of a justRead MoreEthics and Social Justice1635 Words   |  7 Pagesutilitarian theory. 2) Reviews the article â€Å"Interest s, Universal, and Particular: Bentham’s Utilitarian Theory of Value.† 3) Reflects on recent events in the news chronicling human rights violation in public and nonprofit organizations trough the selection of 3 specific examples of human rights violations in a public or nonprofit organization 4) Consideration of how the resolution of these violations could be ranked according to utilitarian theory Ethics and Social Justice IntroductionRead MoreEthics and Social Justice1646 Words   |  7 Pagesutilitarian theory. 2) Reviews the article â€Å"Interest s, Universal, and Particular: Bentham’s Utilitarian Theory of Value.† 3) Reflects on recent events in the news chronicling human rights violation in public and nonprofit organizations trough the selection of 3 specific examples of human rights violations in a public or nonprofit organization 4) Consideration of how the resolution of these violations could be ranked according to utilitarian theory Ethics and Social Justice Introduction Read MoreEthics Module 21166 Words   |  5 Pagesact in a particular situation will be for all those affected. If its consequences bring more net good than those of any alternative course of action, then this action is the right one and the one we should perform. Shaw and Barry talked about the theory of a woman on her death bed. She had $25,000 in cash under her bed and her dying wish was to give that to her nephew. Her nephew was a known drunk and would have squandered the money away. Another use for that money would be to give it to an orphanageRead MoreArguments against Act Utilitarianism Essay1224 Words   |  5 Pages(henceforth AU) does not account for justice when applied to ethical dilemmas. It is the authors opinion that these claims are factually incorrect and this essay shall attempt to prove this through analysis of common arguments against AU, and modifying AU to allow for justice to be more readily accounted for. AU is an ethical theory credited largely to Jeremy Bentham. AU attempts to assign every action a value, or utility. The principle of utility means the â€Å"principle which approves or disapproves of